Who should be involved?
Students,
Classroom Teachers, Read to Succeed Teachers, Parents, Administrators, Superintendents,
Resource Room Teachers, English as an Additional Language Teachers, and
Literacy Teachers.
How might they be
engaged?
By collecting observations, feedback, opinions, data and through
conversation, each of the stakeholders can provide reflection and the success
or failure of the Read to Succeed goals.
What are you going to evaluate? Describe program (logic model).
The program I have chosen to evaluate is the Saskatoon
Public School Divisions’ Read to Succeed Program. The goals of the program are to improve
student reading performance and instill confidence and competency so that
children may work well independently in a regular classroom. Progress is also gained by gains made in
Grade Level Equivalency (GLE).
What is the purpose of
the evaluation?
The purpose of the program is to evaluate whether the
program is reaching it’s goals and to what extent.
Who will use the evaluation? How
will they use it?
|
Who/users
|
How will
they use the information?
|
|
Read
to Succeed Teachers
|
Teachers
working directly with students, eg. Read to Succeed teachers, Resource
teachers and classroom teachers will be able to evaluate whether or not they
are reaching their goals. Literacy
teachers and consultants will be able to measure the gains made and the areas
which require modification.
|
|
Literacy
Teachers
|
|
|
Literacy
Consultants
|
|
|
School Administrators
|
The
principal and vice principal in the school will be able to measure the
effectiveness of the program in order to improve the Continuous Improvement
Framework set out by the Ministry and Division which is to create higher
literacy rates among students.
|
What questions will
the evaluation seek to answer?
Are the goals of the Read to Succeed Program clear and
understood by all the stakeholders? If
not, what clarifications or additions are needed? What would each of the
stakeholders proclaim the value or effectiveness of the program to be? What extra training, resources, information
or support do the stakeholders require in order for the goals to be attained?
What information do you need to
answer the questions?
|
What I
wish to know
|
Indicators
– How will I know it?
|
|
The
knowledge of the program of stakeholders.
|
Survey
and interview.
|
|
The
procedures and implementation steps of the program.
|
Interview
and observation.
|
|
What
is working well with the program?
|
Interview
and Testimonials from stakeholders.
|
|
What
is not working well or not being utilized and why?
|
Interview
and survey.
|
|
What
modifications could be applied to the program?
|
Survey
and interview.
|
|
What
information, training, supports and resources would make the program more
successful?
|
Survey
and interview.
|
When is the evaluation
needed?
The results of the evaluation should be attainable by the
end of April, so that they can be shared with the stakeholders and suggested
modificationschanges in the final school report.
What evaluation design
will you use?
The evaluation design used will be Provus’s Discrepancy
Model which is designed to: improving
the existing Read to Succeed Program, address the greater accountability of
educators to the public and make wiser decisions by administrators (and
consultants) about the implementation and effect of the program.
|
|
Collect the information
What
sources of information will you use?
Existing
Information: Read to Succeed and Resource Room teachers’ evaluations and
feedback on the program. AFL and CAT/4
test scores as well as daily work gathered from the teachers.
People:
Read
to Succeed, Resource Room and Classroom teachers.
Pictorial
Records and Observations: Observations obtained through learning walks and
teachers opinions of student confidence and competence will be collected.
What data collection method(s) will
you use?
|
X
|
Survey
|
X
|
Document review
|
|
X
|
Interview
|
X
|
Testimonials
|
|
X
|
Observation
|
|
Expert panel
|
|
|
Group techniques
|
|
Simulated problems or situations
|
|
|
Case study
|
|
Journal, log, diary
|
|
X
|
Tests
|
|
Unobtrusive measures
|
|
|
Photos, videos
|
|
Other (list)
|
Instrumentation:
What is needed to record the information?
A survey
must be created, as well as a set of interview questions seeking information
about the goals and purpose of the program and it’s effectiveness. A checklist for observation, based on a
review of the Read to Succeed documents.
A gathering of student samples and assessments (recent and from the
beginning of the program) to compare and ask teachers to comment on.
When will you collect data for each
method you’ve chosen?
|
Method
|
Before
program
|
During
program
|
Immediately
after
|
Later
|
|
Survey
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Interview
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Observation
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Tests
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
Document
Review
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
X
|
|
|
Will a sample be used?
|
No
|
X
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
If yes,
describe the procedure you will use.
|
Pilot
testing: when, where, how?
Pilot
testing will occur before the evaluation begins specifically by looking at the
survey questions, interview questions and tests collected by a groups of
stakeholders.
Analyze and Interpret
The surveys,
interview questions and observations will be gathered and sorted so that they
can be summarized and compared to the review of the Read to Succeed program
review. The testing of Grade Level
Equivalency will be done prior to and after the evaluation.
How will the data be analyzed?
Data Analysis: the survey questions, interview information
and observation questions will be sorted and studied for similar attributes.
Methods: Common ideas, criticisms and suggestions
will be grouped together, as well as measurement of growth (GLE).
Who is Responsible? The evaluators will be responsible
for sorting the information.
How will the information be interpreted—by whom?
The information
will be categorized and analyzed, then shared with stakeholders to be analyzed
again and interpreted by those directly involved in the day to day
implementation of the program as well as by the administrators and literacy
consultants downtown for suggestions and improvements.
What did you learn? What are the limitations?
The stakeholders
will meet to discuss the results and whether or not gains have been made. They will discuss what implications might
have occurred and what led to the successes or goals not met. The stakeholders will develop a list of
modifications or changes which could be implemented so that goals are attained. The limitations might be the attitudes and
opinions of the stakeholders with regard to the barriers which might exist in
student success in the program Eg. Student absences, or transiency. Another
limiting factor might be the resources suggested to improve the program.
Use the Information
How will the evaluation be communicated and shared?
|
To whom
|
When/where/how to present
|
|
Teachers
|
A summarization of the
findings will be presented to the teachers.
|
|
|
A meeting or
in-service would gather the stakeholders together to make suggestions and
ofer improvements.
|
|
Administrators
|
Administrators would
be included in the summarization presentation and the in-service.
|
|
Parents
|
A short report on the
findings and the suggestions for improvement would be shared with parents
(letter or email).
|
Next steps?
The stakeholders and evaluators would gather to design
a timeline and actions related to the outcomes, the suggestions and the changes
needed for improvement. Administrators
would then share the information with their superintendents.
|
X
|
Human subject’s protection
|
X
|
Utility
|
|
X
|
Management chart
|
X
|
Feasibility
|
|
X
|
Timeline
|
X
|
Propriety
|
|
X
|
Responsibilities
|
X
|
Accuracy
|
|
X
|
Budget
|
|
|
Great job Krista. You have provided a wonderful level of detail for each point. You demonstrate a great depth of thought in regards to the planning. You have a solid foundation upon which to base your plan. You identify a great range of potential stakeholders. I found the sections on analysis and collection of data to be especially strong.
ReplyDeleteJay